
Please paste the P2 article HTML into the input and rerun the validator. I’ll apply the 14 gates and the intro, language, and delivery checks to that text.
If you’d rather I generate the article from the research notes and content plan instead, say so. I’d then draft it first. The research notes have conflicts that would need handling, for example:
– **Lendo requirements:** the notes give 6 months debt-free at Kronofogden, but also cite 120,000 kr income from 44finance. Gate 10 and Gate 11 would require hedging or moving those items to the rumor list.
– **Gallringstid:** the notes say 3 years for private persons, which is verified, but the Financer ”5 years after debt restructuring” claim is low-confidence and needs hedging.
– **Missing primary sources:** the notes lack Kronofogden, FI primary text on the 12 § rule, and the 2025 consumer-credit report. Several claims would need downgrading.
– **Quality-gate failures:** the research set fails the tier 1–2 share (60%) and the unique-source minimum (18), so the article would need extra sourcing or hedging.







